Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664448›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Comprehensive analysis of supervised learning methods for electrical source imaging.

Sarah Reynaud, Adrien Merlini, Douraied Ben Salem, François Rousseau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah ReynaudIMT Atlantique, LaTIM U1101 INSERM, Brest, France.
Adrien MerliniIMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285, Brest, France.
Douraied Ben SalemUniv Brest, CHU Brest, LaTIM UMR 1101, Brest, France.
François RousseauIMT Atlantique, LaTIM U1101 INSERM, Brest, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography source imaging (ESI) is an ill-posed inverse problem: an additional constraint is needed to find a unique solution. The choice of this constraint, or prior, remains a challenge for most ESI methods. This work explores the application of supervised learning methods for spatio-temporal ESI, where the relationship between measurements and sources is learned directly from the data. Three neural networks were trained on synthetic data and compared with non-learning based methods. Two distinct types of simulation, each based on different models of brain electrical activity, were employed to quantitatively assess the generalization capabilities of the neural networks and the impact of training data on their performances, using five complementary metrics. The results demonstrate that, with appropriately designed simulations, neural networks can be competitive with non-learning-based approaches, even when applied to previously unseen data.

Indexed as

data simulationdeep learningelectroencephalographyinverse problemneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID39664448
PMCPMC11631848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.