ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024
The Use of Nitinol Continuous Compression Implants in Orthopaedic Trauma.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Continuous compression implants (CCIs) can provide continuous compression across a fracture site. They are mainly used in foot/ankle surgery, with very limited descriptions in the literature of their potential for trauma. The aim of this study was to describe the use and associated outcomes of CCIs in modern day trauma practice. Methods: This was a single-centred case series with a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of any patients who were treated with a CCI across 4 years. The primary outcome was to determine the mode of the CCIs and secondary outcomes were unplanned returns to theatre. Results: 60 patients were eligible with a mean age of 44.2 and 122 CCIs were used. 51 patients were treated for acute fractures, 9 were treated for non-unions, and 27 patients had open injuries. 42 of the 122 CCIs were used as definitive fixation (midfoot dislocations, an iliac wing fixation and isolated medial malleolus fixation), and the rest as adjuncts for fixation; of this remainder, 39 were used in reduction mode, 38 for fixation of key fragments, and 3 for compression. Ten patients returned to theatre, two for metalwork failure, two for infection and 6 for non-unions-three were acute fractures and three originally non-unions. Conclusion: This paper demonstrates a novel technique for the use of CCIs in UK trauma practice as either definitive fixations or in three different modes as adjuncts to fixation. They do not replace tradition implants but do have equivalent rates of complications. They may be a useful tool in the arsenal for trauma surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.