ArticleJournal of computational and cognitive engineering2024
Deterministic Versus Nondeterministic Optimization Algorithms for the Restricted Boltzmann Machine.
Article in Journal of computational and cognitive engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
A restricted Boltzmann machine is a fully connected shallow neural network. It can be used to solve many challenging optimization problems. The Boltzmann machines are usually considered probability models. Probability models normally use nondeterministic algorithms to solve their parameters. The Hopfield network which is also known as the Ising model is a special case of a Boltzmann machine, in the sense that the hidden layer is the same as the visible layer. The weights and biases from the visible layer to the hidden layer are the same as the weights and biases from the hidden layer to the visible layer. When the Hopfield network is considered a probabilistic model, everything is treated as stochastic (i.e., random) and nondeterministic. An optimization problem in the Hopfield network is considered searching for the samples that have higher probabilities according to a probability density function. This paper proposes a method to consider the Hopfield network as a deterministic model, in which nothing is random, and no stochastic distribution is used. An optimization problem associated with the Hopfield network thus has a deterministic objective function (also known as loss function or cost function) that is the energy function itself. The purpose of the objective function is to assist the Hopfield network to reach a state that has a lower energy. This study suggests that deterministic optimization algorithms can be used for the associated optimization problems. The deterministic algorithm has the same mathematical form for the calculation of a perceptron that consists of a dot product, a bias, and a nonlinear activation function. This paper uses some examples of searching for stable states to demonstrate that the deterministic optimization method may have a faster convergence rate and smaller errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.