ReviewJournal of hip preservation surgery2024
Combined hip arthroscopy with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia: a systematic review.
Review in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing 2-Year Outcomes between Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome vs. Hip Arthroscopy Alone for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Without Dysplasia.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Regression of focal acetabular rim ossifications after periacetabular osteotomy.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Rising star editorial: Periacetabular osteotomy-Reliable outcome and expanding indications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Commentary on Master's Surgical Technique: One-stage Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Peri-acetabular Osteotomy.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
- A growing role for Registry data to guide discussions with patients on their treatment options.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a surgical procedure that corrects acetabular dysplasia without necessarily addressing intra-articular pathology. Hip arthroscopy is being increasingly used to address soft tissue pathologies at the time of a PAO. This review aims to determine patient-reported outcome measure scores (PROMs) of combining hip arthroscopy and PAO. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify English studies that reported upon patient populations that had PAO's performed with arthroscopy at the time of surgery for correcting developmental hip dysplasia. We identified 428 articles; 14 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. Between 2011 and 2022, 1083 hips from the selected articles underwent a combined PAO and arthroscopic procedure, with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. Of the studies that reported it, 63% of the evaluated population were found to have labral tears that required either labral repair (49%), labral debridement (12%) or combined procedure. Multiple PROMs were identified in the literature, with no standardized reporting system used between articles. All articles reported statistically improved patient-reported outcomes from a combined PAO and arthroscopy procedure. There was no difference in PROMs when comparing PAO performed with or without arthroscopy. One study suggested superior outcomes for active individuals who underwent PAO and arthroscopy. Patient-reported outcome scores improve significantly after PAO with or without arthroscopy, with no differences in adverse events, and only limited evidence that active individuals benefit from labral repair.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.