ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2024
Current trends for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis for hip arthroscopy: a modified Delphi and nominal group technique consensus study.
Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk factors for venous thromboembolism after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Venous thromboembolism after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of incidence, risk factors, and international guidelines.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The overall risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hip arthroscopy (HA) is reported to range from 0.2% to 9.5%, but a clear set of recommendations for VTE prophylaxis in HA patients remains scarce. The aim is to survey high-volume hip arthroscopists about their current trends regarding VTE prophylaxis use. A combination of two consensus group methods was used in this study: nominal group technique (NGT) and modified Delphi. A preliminary questionnaire was prepared, and rounds of discussion were completed between NGT members. The final version of the survey was administered to 35 high-volume hip surgeons. Delegates' mean volume of annual hip arthroscopic surgery was 109. Approximately 22% of their patients are revision HA procedures. A total of 91.4% of delegates use chemoprophylaxis, 28.6% use sequential compression devices and 91.4% believed that chemoprophylaxis is necessary for more prolonged and complex procedures (strong consensus). Aspirin was the choice for all participants, and the duration was 2-3 weeks (31.4%), 1 month (65.7%) and 2-3 months (2.9%). History of VTE, hypercoagulable status, and malignancy were considered risk factors. No consensus was achieved for the discontinuation of oral contraceptive and smoking preoperatively. However, the optimal length of VTE prophylaxis is unclear. A total of 97.1% of the experts responded that they administer aspirin between 2 and 4 weeks. High-volume arthroscopic surgeons do consider VTE prophylaxis to be important and warranted in the postoperative setting. Aspirin is the mainstay of chemoprophylaxis, although the appropriate duration is unknown.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.