ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2024
Feasibility of embedding orthopaedic clinical trials into national registries: a pilot quality improvement study for the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry (UK-NAHR).
Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A growing role for Registry data to guide discussions with patients on their treatment options.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of 'Registry-based Randomised Control Trials' (RRCT) into national registries has the potential to catalyse prospective research, enhancing the evidence base for practice. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of embedding a trial within the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry. This was a national observational, multi-centre study. Six pilot sites within the UK were provided with additional support for data collection. We compared the ability of these pilot sites to collect data with the ability of centres where no additional support was provided. We collected information on patient compliance, efficacy and adverse events of drugs routinely used after hip preserving surgery. The primary outcome measure was compliance with data collection in these centres at 30 and 90 days after surgery. Our intention was to assess the feasibility of, and factors influencing, the capturing data for interventional registry trials in the future. Two hundred and twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry during the study period (114 within pilot centres and 114 in non-pilot centres). Pilot centres had a mean follow-up compliance of 79% (30 days) and 69.4% (90 days) in contrast to 55% (30 days) and 47% (90 days) in the non-pilot centres (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.