ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of Patient-Initiated Follow-Up (PIFU) Service in a Fracture Clinic: A Comprehensive Service Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction Audit.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient-initiated follow-up in surgical specialties: meta-analysis and meta-regression.BJS open · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Outpatient clinics are increasingly challenged by high patient volumes and rising "did not attend" (DNA) rates, leading to extended wait times and declines in patient satisfaction. Traditional follow-up (FU) models with routinely scheduled appointments contribute to inefficiencies, as stable patients may attend unnecessary visits, thus straining clinic resources. The patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) model offers an alternative where patients schedule appointments only when necessary. This study evaluates PIFU's efficacy in improving outpatient services and patient satisfaction by reducing routine appointments and prioritizing patient-driven follow-up. Methods This service evaluation and patient satisfaction audit was conducted at the fracture clinic of Royal Shrewsbury Hospital over three months (December 2023-March 2024). Out of 3828 patients seen, 203 were assigned to PIFU based on criteria indicating stable conditions with minimal follow-up requirements. The remaining patients were either scheduled for routine follow-ups or discharged. Data were collected retrospectively from clinic records, and a structured questionnaire assessed patient satisfaction with the PIFU service. Results Among the 203 patients assigned to PIFU, 183 (90.15%) patients received an informational leaflet, with all respondents finding it easy to understand. However, only 41 (20.2%) of patients utilized the PIFU service, primarily for concerns about pain, healing, or complications. Satisfaction among PIFU users was high, with 163 (80.3%) patients rating the service 5/5. Non-users mostly cited no perceived need for follow-up. Demographic analysis indicated that patients aged 40-60 were predominant (n=132; 65.02%) among the PIFU cohort. Conclusion The PIFU model demonstrated the potential to alleviate clinic workload by reducing routine follow-ups while maintaining high patient satisfaction. Although utilization rates were low, those who engaged found the service beneficial, suggesting PIFU's value for patients comfortable with self-management. Improved patient education may enhance engagement, supporting the broader implementation of PIFU in outpatient settings. Further research is warranted to explore barriers to patient-initiated follow-up and refine eligibility criteria for optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.