ArticleCureus2024
Renal Infarction in a Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal infarction is a rare but potentially serious condition, often misdiagnosed due to its non-specific presentation, which mimics conditions such as nephrolithiasis and pyelonephritis. Discussed in this case report is a 68-year-old woman who presented to an emergency department with two weeks of worsening left flank pain. She was found to have a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) on electrocardiogram (ECG) and CT findings revealing renal infarction. The patient was effectively managed with anticoagulation, pain relief, and outpatient vascular surgery follow-up. Early identification was crucial to mitigating complications such as renovascular hypertension and chronic kidney disease. This case underscores the importance of maintaining clinical suspicion for renal infarction in patients presenting with unexplained flank pain in the setting of new-onset AF. Our report highlights the value of a thorough history, physical examination, and timely imaging. These factors ensure both optimal diagnostic accuracy and improved patient-centered outcomes with this rare pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.