ArticleCureus2024
Familiarity and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education: Perspectives of Students in a Community-Oriented Medical School.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medical Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Familiarity With AI in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Psychometric Evaluation of the Artificial Intelligence Perception Scale for Cancer Patients: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Dental students' knowledge, perceptions, and educational needs regarding artificial intelligence: a multinational cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based chatbots improve the efficiency of course orientation among medical students: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim Medical students are expected to be familiar with artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare. This cross-sectional study looked at the attitudes, thoughts, and understanding of healthcare students toward AI. Materials and methods During the academic year 2023-2024, medical students enrolled in the College of Medicine and Health Sciences (CMHS) at the Arabian Gulf University (AGU) were included in this study. A questionnaire was developed to evaluate their understanding and opinions regarding the use of AI in medical training. These data were gathered, categorized, and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). Categorical variables were shown in the form of frequencies and percentages, whereas continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). Chi-square tests were utilized for comparing categorical variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study found that n=41 (27%) of medical students are very familiar with AI applications while n=92 (60.5%) are somewhat familiar. Familiarity increases as students progress in their medical education, with senior clinical phase students more familiar than juniors. There was no significant difference in perceptions of AI application among medical phases. Familiarity with research methodology and studies increases familiarity with AI applications. Most students believe AI will have a positive impact on medical education, but perceptions vary by educational phase. Many students support integrating AI into curricula with 67 (44.1%) of students using AI applications, with a higher percentage in pre-clinical phases, likely due to application in research projects in this phase. Concerns were raised about AI impacting the human touch in medical practice and doctor-patient communication, as well as technical challenges faced by students when applying AI. Conclusion Arab Gulf medical students show positive attitudes toward AI applications in medical education. Tailored educational strategies are needed to optimize AI integration in medical practice and address concerns effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.