Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664101›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning in banking systems: a qualitative survey of board of directors.

Abdullah Eskandarany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdullah EskandaranyCollege of Business, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the paper is twofold. First to examine the role of the board of directors in facilitating the adoption of AI and ML in Saudi Arabian banking sector. Second, to explore the effectiveness of artificial intelligence and machine learning in protection of Saudi Arabian banking sector from cyberattacks. A qualitative research approach was applied using in-depth interviews with 17 board of directors from prominent Saudi Arabian banks. The present study highlights both the opportunities and challenges of integrating artificial intelligence and machine learning advanced technologies in this highly regulated industry. Findings reveal that advanced artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies offer substantial benefits, particularly in areas like threat detection, fraud prevention, and process automation, enabling banks to meet regulatory standards and mitigate cyber threats efficiently. However, the research also identifies significant barriers, including limited technological infrastructure, a lack of cohesive artificial intelligence strategies, and ethical concerns around data privacy and algorithmic bias. Interviewees emphasized the board of directors' critical role in providing strategic direction, securing resources, and fostering partnerships with artificial intelligence technology providers. The study further highlights the importance of aligning artificial intelligence and machine learning initiatives with national development goals, such as Saudi Vision 2030, to ensure sustained growth and competitiveness. The findings from the present study offer valuable implications for policymakers in banking in navigating the complexities of artificial intelligence and machine learning adoption in financial services, particularly in emerging markets.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebanking sectorboard of directorsmachine learningSaudi Arabiastakeholder theory

Identifiers

PMID39664101
PMCPMC11631877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.