Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664097›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2024

Building a Neurogastroenterology Unit: Why, Where, and How?

Thomas Frieling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Setting up an autonomic unit within the neurological department: a position statement of the European Federation of Autonomic Societies.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas FrielingDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Disorders of the gut-brain axis are public diseases ("Volkskrankheiten") and are among the most frequent reasons to visit a doctor. Despite their great medical and socio-economic importance, patients suffering from these disorders are often not taken seriously and, therefore, do not receive sufficient diagnostic evaluation, or a diagnosis, in conformity with the relevant guidelines. In addition, the inadequate compensation of services makes handling of neurogastroenterological disorders increasingly unattractive. As a result, neurogastroenterology is under-represented in medical curricula, with a decreasing number of scientists in academia who are familiar with this field in Germany. Summary: The prevalence of neurogastroenterological diseases, which is associated with the need for medical care, should create corresponding care as a "bottom-up" development. However, this is not possible in the German healthcare system, due to the inadequate reimbursement structures. Therefore, a "top-down" strategy must be developed through health policy directives, directing the establishment of neurogastroenterology units based on quality parameters and need. These centers must form comprehensive network structures and share essential information on neurogastroenterological diseases with general practitioners, clinicians, and patients. Appropriate apps that also focus on interdisciplinary care with the involvement of various specialist disciplines (e.g., gastroenterology, neurology, gynecology, urology, psychology, psychosomatics, nutritional medicine) would be helpful for this purpose. Key Messages: Neurogastroenterology units are important and should be interdisciplinary and located in tertiary centers. Due to the lack of incentives in the German healthcare system, they must be instituted through health policy directives from the top down.

Indexed as

Functional dyspepsiaGastrointestinal functionGut-brain disordersIrritable bowel syndromeNeurogastroenterology

Identifiers

PMID39664097
PMCPMC11631036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.