Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664096›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2024

Management of Fecal Incontinence: Surgical Treatment Options.

Birgit Bittorf, Klaus E Matzel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Outcomes of a novel multidisciplinary approach to delivering sacral neuromodulation services away from the operating theatre.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Birgit BittorfDepartment of Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Klaus E MatzelDepartment of Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a frequent, often underestimated, health issue in adults. Its treatment is primarily nonsurgical. Only if conservative options fail to result in adequate symptom reduction should surgery be considered. We present an overview of historical and current surgical treatment options. Summary: Well-known sphincter replacement techniques such as dynamic graciloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter are no longer used because of their invasiveness and relevant comorbidity. Today, sphincteroplasty and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) are the most common procedures recommended in current guidelines. The therapeutic choice is based on diagnostic findings. Sphincteroplasty is an option only in patients with an anal sphincter lesion and has only moderate long-term success. SNM has become the established first choice in multiple pathophysiological conditions resulting in FI, as it has proved highly successful with minimal invasiveness. Over time, the spectrum of indications has evolved and the technique is now successful in morphological sphincter defects as well. Key Messages: The spectrum of surgical options to treat FI is limited. Owing to its efficacy and low comorbidity, SNM is now considered the gold standard in multiple pathophysiological and morphological conditions, whereas sphincteroplasty remains an option in patients with FI from a defined sphincter lesion.

Indexed as

Fecal incontinenceSacral neuromodulationSphincteroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39664096
PMCPMC11631101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.