Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663948›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2025

Using veterinary health records at scale to investigate ageing dogs and their common issues in primary care.

J Jackson, A D Radford, Z Belshaw, L J Wallis, E Kubinyi, A J German, C Westgarth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J JacksonInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-1789-1304
A D RadfordInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4590-1334
Z BelshawEvivet Research Consultancy, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5652-3324
L J WallisInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3931-3250
E KubinyiDepartment of Ethology, Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4468-9845
A J GermanInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-7988
C WestgarthInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0471-2761

Funding

PetSavers
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe UK dog population is living longer, raising concerns about their welfare as a result of ageing-related diseases. Our primary objective was to determine when dogs enter the "old age" life stage based on free-text clinical narratives in veterinary electronic health records. In addition, to identify common conditions documented during consultations with old dogs. MATERIALS AND

methodsRegular expressions were developed for: ageing, elderly, geriatric, senior and old. These were used to search the veterinary clinical narratives within a large database of veterinary electronic health records. A sample of 1000 consultations were then read, and those confirmed as being old age classified according to a modified scheme based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Disease 10th Revision.

resultsA total of 832 old age dogs were identified. The age at which veterinary professionals considered dogs to be in old age was over 7.25 years in 95% of patients (median age 12.5 years). This age varied among the most common breeds, with cocker spaniels being younger (median 11.7 years) compared with Jack Russell terriers (14.1 years). Weight-related (289/832 consultations, 35%), musculoskeletal (278, 33%), dental (254, 31%), integumentary (235, 28%) and digestive (187, 22%) conditions were most common. The odds of a dental condition were greater (odds ratio: 2.71, 95% confidence interval: 1.38 to 5.31) and musculoskeletal condition less (odds ratio: 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.81) in cocker spaniels than in a mixed breeds reference. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This metric applied at scale to identify old patients may provide a novel foundation for timely health interventions targeted to dogs at increased risk of developing various age-related conditions.

Indexed as

AgingDog DiseasesElectronic Health RecordsAge FactorsAnimalsDogsFemaleMalePrimary Health CareUnited KingdomVeterinary Medicine

Identifiers

PMID39663948
PMCPMC11821469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.