Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663902›Full record

ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025

Treatment of Acne Vulgaris With a 650-ms, 1064-nm Nd:YAG Laser: A Retrospective Study.

Idowu D Olugbade, Anna C Petty, Joyce Imahiyerobo-Ip

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Idowu D OlugbadeThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-5126
Anna C PettyVibrant Dermatology, Dedham, Massachusetts, USA.
Joyce Imahiyerobo-IpVibrant Dermatology, Dedham, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 650-ms, 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser device may provide superior efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of acne vulgaris over conventional treatments.

aimTo evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a 650-ms laser for the treatment of mild to severe facial acne vulgaris. PATIENTS/

methodsRecords of 225 subjects with mild to severe facial acne vulgaris and treated with a 650-ms laser were reviewed.

resultsSubjects required a median of 3 treatments to achieve clearance. Clearance was achieved in 108/225 (48%) subjects. Adverse effects were limited to acne flare-ups and dryness. Treatment with isotretinoin was not required in 180/209 (80%) of subjects. A variety of topical and oral medications and non-laser procedures may be used in conjunction with the 650-ms laser without adverse effects. At the 6-month follow-up visit, the median Investigator Global Scale (IGA) score was 1.0 (almost clear). For most IGA-rated parameters differences between white patients and patients with skin of color were not statistically significant.

conclusionThe 650-ms, 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser provides a safe and efficacious treatment of mild to severe acne in patients with white skin and skin of color.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisLasers, Solid-StateLow-Level Light TherapyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCaucasianpulse widthskin of color

Identifiers

PMID39663902
PMCPMC11845970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.