Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663620›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean Academy of Nursing2024

[Development and Effectiveness of Progressive Simulation Education Program on Medication Safety for Nursing Students].

Se-Young Jung, Eun-Young Kim

Abstract readControlled Clinical TrialEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Se-Young JungCollege of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6550-5638
Eun-Young KimCollege of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea. eykim@dau.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-1913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to develop and verify a progressive simulation education program aimed at enhancing nursing students' medication safety competency.

methodsA non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design was adopted. The participants were 40 third-year nursing students with no prior simulation education experience, comprising 20 each in the experimental and control groups. The experimental treatment utilized a hybrid simulation approach incorporating both full-body mannequins and standardized patients and was, conducted over three sessions with durations of 65, 80, and 95 minutes for the first, second, and third sessions, respectively, for a total of 240 minutes. The program was constructed based on Jeffries' simulation model.

resultsThe levels of medication safety competencies, communication self-efficacy, learning self-efficacy, and problem-solving abilities of the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group.

conclusionOur results confirm that the program effectively improves nursing students' medication safety competence, communication self-efficacy, learning self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability. Therefore, this program can serve as a basis for developing educational strategies related to medication safety for nursing education institutions. Furthermore, the program is anticipated to have a positive impact on novice nurses' education and practice in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateProgram EvaluationSelf EfficacyStudents, NursingAdultClinical CompetenceCommunicationEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleManikinsProblem SolvingProgram DevelopmentSimulation TrainingSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical CompetenceMedication ErrorProgram DevelopmentSimulation TrainingStudents, Nursing

Identifiers

PMID39663620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.