Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663535›Full record

ArticleClinical diabetes and endocrinology2024

Association between the early or late onset of gestational diabetes mellitus with neonatal adverse outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Fabiana Vieira Duarte de Souza Reis, Carlos Izaias Sartorão Filho, Luis Sobrevia, Caroline Baldini Prudencio, Bruna Bologna, Luana Favaro Iamundo, Adriely Magyori, Luiz Takano, Raissa Escandiussi Avramidis, Rafael Guilen de Oliveira and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical diabetes and endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fabiana Vieira Duarte de Souza Reis *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Carlos Izaias Sartorão Filho *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Luis Sobrevia *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Caroline Baldini Prudencio *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Bruna Bologna *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Luana Favaro Iamundo *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Adriely Magyori *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Luiz Takano *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Raissa Escandiussi Avramidis *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Rafael Guilen de Oliveira *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil.
Angélica Mércia Pascon Barbosa *Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil. angelicapascon@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-3606
Diamater Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe literature has been evolving to standardize gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis and terminology. The significance of timing in diagnosing hyperglycemia during pregnancy is underlined by evidence that women diagnosed at 24 weeks of gestation or earlier are at a higher risk of developing postpartum prediabetes, but its association with adverse outcomes for the newborn is controversial. We aimed to investigate the association between early-onset GDM and adverse outcomes in newborns and neonates, comparing it with the late-onset GDM model.

methodsIt was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Perinatal Diabetes Research Center in Assis/SP, affiliated with the Botucatu Medical School-UNESP in Brazil. The group composition was as follows: early-onset participants had fasting glucose levels ≥ 92 mg/dL and < 126 mg/dL before 20 weeks of gestation, while late-onset participants had a negative first-trimester screening and a positive 75g-OGTT at 24-28 weeks. For early-onset GDM, a fasting glucose level of ≥ 92 mg/dL is a recognized threshold associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, while < 126 mg/dL ensures the exclusion of overt diabetes. The criteria for late-onset GDM, involving a negative initial screening and a positive OGTT at 24-28 weeks, align with the standard diagnostic timeframe when insulin resistance typically peaks due to placental hormone secretion. The maternal baseline characteristics included pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) and pregnancy weight gain (kg), calculated as the difference between the final pregnancy weight (36 gestational weeks or more) and pre-pregnancy maternal weight, classified according to the pre-pregnancy BMI. Additionally, the perinatal outcomes evaluated in this study included gestational age (GA) at birth, birth weight (BW) categorized according to GA as adequate, large, or small and Apgar scores at the first and 5th minutes.

resultsEight hundred eighty pregnant women were selected, of whom 203 (23.07%) presented GDM and were eligible from December 2016 to December 2021. Based on the timing onset of GDM, 89 (43.8%) were in the early-onset group, and 114 (56.2%) were in the late-onset group. The fasting plasma glucose values in the first trimester were higher in the early-onset group. The 75-g OGTT values were higher in the late-onset group. The final BMI was higher in the early-onset group. Univariate linear regression was performed to determine the relationship between late-onset and maternal and neonatal outcomes; however, no significant relation was detected.

conclusionPregnant women with early-onset GDM showed a higher BMI during pregnancy, but there was no difference between early and late-onset GDM concerning neonatal adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

Adverse pregnancy outcomesGestational diabetes mellitusGlucose tolerance testNeonatal outcome

Identifiers

PMID39663535
PMCPMC11636010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.