ArticleBMC cancer2024
Prediction of gene expression-based breast cancer proliferation scores from histopathology whole slide images using deep learning.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transforming histologic assessment: artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and personalized treatment.British journal of cancer · 2025Pooled it
- A Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Clinico-Histology-Genomic Prognostic Model in Prostate Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn breast cancer, several gene expression assays have been developed to provide a more personalised treatment. This study focuses on the prediction of two molecular proliferation signatures: an 11-gene proliferation score and the MKI67 proliferation marker gene. The aim was to assess whether these could be predicted from digital whole slide images (WSIs) using deep learning models.
methodsWSIs and RNA-sequencing data from 819 invasive breast cancer patients were included for training, and models were evaluated on an internal test set of 172 cases as well as on 997 cases from a fully independent external test set. Two deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models were optimised using WSIs and gene expression readouts from RNA-sequencing data of either the proliferation signature or the proliferation marker, and assessed using Spearman correlation (r). Prognostic performance was assessed through Cox proportional hazard modelling, estimating hazard ratios (HR).
resultsOptimised CNNs successfully predicted the proliferation score and proliferation marker on the unseen internal test set (ρ = 0.691(p < 0.001) with R
conclusionsThe results from this study suggest that gene expression levels of proliferation scores can be predicted directly from breast cancer morphology in WSIs using CNNs and that the predictions provide prognostic information that could be used in research as well as in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.