Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663522›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2024

Gabapentinoid use and the risk of fractures in patients with inflammatory arthritis: nested case-control study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum.

Ian C Scott, Noor Daud, James Bailey, Helen Twohig, Samantha L Hider, Christian D Mallen, Kelvin P Jordan, Sara Muller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ian C ScottPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK. i.scott@keele.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1268-9808
Noor DaudPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
James BaileyPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Helen TwohigPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Samantha L HiderPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Christian D MallenPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Kelvin P JordanPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Sara MullerPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGabapentinoids are increasingly prescribed in inflammatory arthritis (IA), despite no trial evidence for efficacy at managing pain in this population. Observational studies in non-IA populations suggest gabapentinoids are associated with fractures but are limited by methodological heterogeneity/potential residual confounding. Patients with IA generally have an increased risk of fracture so may be particularly vulnerable. We examined the relationship between fractures and gabapentinoids in patients with IA who had all been prescribed a gabapentinoid at some point (to minimise confounding by indication).

methodsOur matched case-control study used linked national data from English primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum) and Hospital Episode Statistics. A cohort was constructed of adults with IA, contributing data 01/01/2004-31/03/2021, and ever prescribed oral gabapentinoids. Cases with an incident fracture post-cohort inclusion were ascertained and 1:5 risk set-matched (on age/gender/gabapentinoid type) with controls. Gabapentinoid prescription exposure was categorised as follows: (a) current (overlapping with fracture date); (b) recent (ending 1-60 days pre-fracture); and (c) remote (ending > 60 days pre-fracture). Conditional logistic regression models determined ORs with 95% CIs for fractures with current or recent vs. remote gabapentinoid use, adjusting for confounders.

resultsA total of 2485 cases (mean age 63.0 years; 79.4% female) and 12,244 controls (mean age 62.7 years; 79.6% female) were included. Of cases: 1512 received gabapentin, 910 pregabalin, and 63 both drugs; 65.6% were remote, 5.5% recent, and 28.9% current users. In adjusted models, current gabapentinoid use had an increased risk of fracture (OR vs. remote: 1.36 [95% CI 1.22, 1.51]). Similar associations were seen with gabapentin (OR 1.38 [1.19, 1.60]) and pregabalin (OR 1.40 [1.18, 1.66]). Similar or higher levels of association were seen for all gabapentin/pregabalin doses except moderate/very high dose gabapentin. Associations were strongest in those starting gabapentinoids more recently.

conclusionsOur study suggests a modest association between current gabapentinoid use and fractures in patients with IA, after accounting for measured and time-invariant unmeasured confounding. Whilst other unmeasured confounding remains possible, given the absence of evidence for gabapentinoid efficacy in patients with IA who are particularly vulnerable to fractures, this highlights a need for efforts to deliver safer gabapentinoid prescribing in this population.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneGabapentinAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsArthritisCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregabalinAnalgesicsGabapentinPregabalinAxial spondyloarthritisFractureGabapentinoidsPsoriatic arthritisRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID39663522
PMCPMC11636031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.