ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Age distribution of retinoblastoma tumours in familial disease.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background40% of children with retinoblastoma have an RB1 gene mutation identified, known as heritable retinoblastoma. It is important to undertake active surveillance (screening) of relatives of those with identified RB1 gene mutations and ensure ongoing surveillance to monitor for new tumour formation or recurrences. Current guidance is to screen patients up to the age of 7 years old. With advancements in treatment methods and survival rates of retinoblastoma being 98%, it has become increasingly important to plan a surveillance programme that is both safe and cost effective. van Hoefen Wijsard et al. proposed that surveillance could be concluded at the age of 4 years.
methodWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with familial retinoblastoma known to our service presenting from 1995 to 2020. 52 patients were eligible for analysis. 47 out of 50 had more than 4 years of follow up (median 129 months).
resultsIn this cohort, the oldest age for new tumour occurrence was 47 months; if patients were screened from an appropriate age according to protocol, the latest age for new tumour occurrence was 28 months. Furthermore, the average age for tumour recurrence was 15 months; the oldest patient with an identified tumour recurrence was 56 months old.
conclusionThis supports the notion that it may be safe to reduce the length of surveillance for new tumours in familial retinoblastoma from 7 years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.