ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Expanding the Scope of Narrative Medicine by Emphasizing Stories from Minoritized Communities: A Novel Facilitator Training Program.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNarrative medicine (NM) emphasizes the vital role healthcare stories play in conveying patients' experiences and expanding health professionals' reflective capacity. Though predicated on inclusivity, social justice, and equality, NM programs do not tend to include communities with marginalized health narratives due to a paucity of trained facilitators.
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a novel virtual NM facilitator training intended to expand NM programming to minoritized communities.
designMixed methods analysis of surveys administered before (pre), after (post), and 6 months after (6mo follow-up) the training.
participantsHealthcare professionals, scholars, caregivers, and patients self-identifying as a member of (n = 25/42, 60%) and/or working with (n = 36/42, 86%) minoritized community groups. MAIN MEASURES: Perceived confidence and skills relating to NM and facilitating NM activities, and open-ended questions about the curriculum across three timepoints.
interventionsTraining occurred over eight half-day sessions with large group plenaries, facilitated small groups, and art and humanities workshops. KEY
resultsResponse rates were n = 34/42 (81%), n = 29/42 (69%), and n = 21/42 (50%), respectively, for the three timepoints. Compared to pre-training, post- and 6mo follow-up surveys showed statistical improvements on six of seven items, including confidence and skill in facilitating NM activities (mean = 3.2 vs. 5.5 vs. 5.4), creating NM curricula (mean = 3.1 vs 5.2 vs. 5.2), defining narrative competence (mean = 4.2 vs. 5.5 vs. 5.3), engaging team members (mean = 4.7 vs. 5.7 vs. 5.5), identifying humanities materials (mean = 3.3 vs 5.0 vs. 5.1), and recognizing diverse perspectives (mean = 4.6 vs. 5.5 vs. 5.5). Pairwise comparisons showed post- and 6mo follow-up responses significantly increased (p ≤ 0.01) from pre-training. Participants reported facilitating more NM activities after training (mean = 1.5 vs. 1.9; p = 0.006).
conclusionsWe successfully recruited and engaged participants from minoritized communities to facilitate NM sessions. Future efforts should focus on objective assessments of skills, and more in-depth research using focus groups, observation, and key informant interviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.