Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663317›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Towards Automated Semantic Segmentation in Mammography Images for Enhanced Clinical Applications.

Cesar A Sierra-Franco, Jan Hurtado, Victor de A Thomaz, Leonardo C da Cruz, Santiago V Silva, Greis Francy M Silva-Calpa, Alberto Raposo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cesar A Sierra-Franco *Tecgraf Institute and Department of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Jan Hurtado *Tecgraf Institute and Department of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. hurtado@tecgraf.puc-rio.br.
Victor de A ThomazTecgraf Institute and Department of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Leonardo C da CruzTecgraf Institute and Department of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Santiago V SilvaTecgraf Institute and Department of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Greis Francy M Silva-CalpaTecgraf Institute and Department of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Alberto RaposoTecgraf Institute and Department of Informatics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammography images are widely used to detect non-palpable breast lesions or nodules, aiding in cancer prevention and enabling timely intervention when necessary. To support medical analysis, computer-aided detection systems can automate the segmentation of landmark structures, which is helpful in locating abnormalities and evaluating image acquisition adequacy. This paper presents a deep learning-based framework for segmenting the nipple, the pectoral muscle, the fibroglandular tissue, and the fatty tissue in standard-view mammography images. To the best of our knowledge, we introduce the largest dataset dedicated to mammography segmentation of key anatomical structures, specifically designed to train deep learning models for this task. Through comprehensive experiments, we evaluated various deep learning model architectures and training configurations, demonstrating robust segmentation performance across diverse and challenging cases. These results underscore the framework's potential for clinical integration. In our experiments, four semantic segmentation architectures were compared, all showing suitability for the target problem, thereby offering flexibility in model selection. Beyond segmentation, we introduce a suite of applications derived from this framework to assist in clinical assessments. These include automating tasks such as multi-view lesion registration and anatomical position estimation, evaluating image acquisition quality, measuring breast density, and enhancing visualization of breast tissues, thus addressing critical needs in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMammographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedBreastFemaleHumansSemanticsApplicationsDatasetDeep learningMammographySemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39663317
PMCPMC12343431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.