ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Towards Automated Semantic Segmentation in Mammography Images for Enhanced Clinical Applications.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic literature review on mammography: deep learning techniques for breast cancer detection with global and Asian perspectives.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Nipple Segmentation in Digital Mammography.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning-Based Radiomics and Deep Learning for Breast Lesion Classification in Mammography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mammography images are widely used to detect non-palpable breast lesions or nodules, aiding in cancer prevention and enabling timely intervention when necessary. To support medical analysis, computer-aided detection systems can automate the segmentation of landmark structures, which is helpful in locating abnormalities and evaluating image acquisition adequacy. This paper presents a deep learning-based framework for segmenting the nipple, the pectoral muscle, the fibroglandular tissue, and the fatty tissue in standard-view mammography images. To the best of our knowledge, we introduce the largest dataset dedicated to mammography segmentation of key anatomical structures, specifically designed to train deep learning models for this task. Through comprehensive experiments, we evaluated various deep learning model architectures and training configurations, demonstrating robust segmentation performance across diverse and challenging cases. These results underscore the framework's potential for clinical integration. In our experiments, four semantic segmentation architectures were compared, all showing suitability for the target problem, thereby offering flexibility in model selection. Beyond segmentation, we introduce a suite of applications derived from this framework to assist in clinical assessments. These include automating tasks such as multi-view lesion registration and anatomical position estimation, evaluating image acquisition quality, measuring breast density, and enhancing visualization of breast tissues, thus addressing critical needs in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.