ReviewCurrent urology reports2024
Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision-Making in Erectile Dysfunction: a Narrative Review.
Review in Current urology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in the research of artificial intelligence in andrology: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Erectile dysfunction in primary care: practice patterns, barriers, and opportunities-narrative review.Sexual medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewArtificial Intelligence (AI) has great potential in erectile dysfunction (ED) diagnosis and treatment. This review aims to summarize AI-based clinical decision-making in ED. RECENT
findingsBased on the literature search, forty-seven articles related to AI and ED were analyzed and their findings were summarized. AI may help diagnose ED and offer treatment for it. Developing AI chatbots may also be beneficial for ED patients who are embarrassed to seek treatment. However, there are deficiencies in AI programs and a lack of accuracy in offering precise diagnoses and treatments for ED. AI technology integrates positively into ED clinical decision-making processes and needs progressive research to gain precision and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39663266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.