ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Translation, adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Quality of Life in a Child's Chronic Disease Questionnaire for the Swedish context.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to translate, adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Quality of Life in a Child's Chronic Disease Questionnaire (QLCCDQ) for the Swedish context. The QLCCDQ was translated into Swedish and adapted to the Swedish context. Data for psychometric testing were obtained through a survey of parents of children and adolescents (n = 627) with chronic diseases: asthma and type 1 diabetes mellitus, with a total of 173 responses (27.6%). Face and content validity of the instrument was assessed, and floor and ceiling effects were measured. Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's alpha and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted. The EFA gave a two-factor solution with an eigenvalue > 1 explaining 73.9% of total variance for the Swedish version. The new subscales are family life and activities (eight questions) and emotions and symptoms (four questions). Three questions concerning anxiety, worry, and guilt loaded < 0.6 and were excluded.
conclusionThe study concludes that the Swedish version of the QLCCDQ is a reliable and valid questionnaire. The instrument may be useful for clinical screening of families who have the greatest need for supportive interventions. However, this should be further evaluated. WHAT IS KNOWN: • A child's chronic disease influences quality of life of its family members. • Few instruments are designed to measure the impact on families. WHAT IS NEW: • The Swedish version of the Quality of Life in a Child's Chronic Disease Questionnaire has two subscales compared to the original's five. • The instrument may potentially be useful for clinical screening of families who have the greatest need for supportive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.