ArticleBMJ open2024
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured integrated post-pulmonary embolism follow-up care model (Attend-PE): a rationale and protocol for a multicentre clinical pre-post study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06037096 (Implementation of a Structured Post-pulmonary Embolism Follow-up Model in a Danish Hospital Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of a Structured Post-pulmonary Embolism Follow-up Model in a Danish Hospital Setting
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiogram for Longitudinal Evaluation of Right Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Rational and Design of CURES-CARE Study.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Patient and public involvement in pulmonary embolism research: insights from the development of a pulmonary embolism follow-up care model.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Impact of an exercise and health education program for health promotion in textile workers: a pre-post intervention study protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Key elements of follow-up care after acute pulmonary embolism focusing on long-term sequelae: a Delphi study among European experts.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Article
- Quality of life after pulmonary embolism: psychometric validation of the Danish electronic version of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with pulmonary embolism (PE) experience impaired functional ability and reduced quality of life long after discharge from the hospital. However, there are no structured follow-up programmes in Denmark for these patients, and there is considerable variation in practice patterns of post-PE management. No studies have investigated the effectiveness of structured follow-up care models in patients with PE. This study aims to investigate the effect and cost-effectiveness of a structured integrated post-pulmonary embolism follow-up care model (Attend-PE) compared with usual care. The Attend-PE model outlines a structured approach for in-hospital follow-up, involving group-based patient education, individual consultations and systematic use of patient-reported outcome measures to assess the patient's physical and psychological well-being. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is conducted in Denmark, where the healthcare system is tax-funded and services are freely available for all citizens, with an expected inclusion of 2000 patients in total. A pre-post-intervention study design is used to compare outcomes in the post-implementation cohort with the pre-implementation cohort. The co-primary outcomes are (1) health-related quality of life (patient-reported outcome, PRO) and (2) adherence to medical treatment (register-based data). Secondary outcomes include PROs on disability, treatment satisfaction, self-management, anxiety, depression and work productivity, and register-based outcomes, including recurrent PE, bleeding, mortality and healthcare use. Register-based data will be assessed at baseline (date of PE event), 6 and 12 months, while PRO-data will be assessed at 6 and 12 months after the PE event. The health economic evaluation of the Attend-PE model will include a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-utility analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project will be conducted by the Declaration of Helsinki. In accordance with the Danish Act on Health Research Ethics §14, the study is exempt from approval. The use of survey responses in research (in anonymous form) is, however, contingent on participants' consent, and the invitation letter therefore included information about the purpose of the study and participants' rights to withdraw consent at any time, and that completion of the questionnaire is considered as consent to their survey data to be included in research.Study findings will be disseminated in scientific peer-reviewed journals, at national and international conferences, and for staff and decision-makers at participating hospitals and patients and relatives via the Danish Heart Association. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06037096.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.