Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663125›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

What research evidence is required on violence against women to inform future pandemic preparedness? A scoping review of the research evidence and gaps.

Aoibheann Brennan-Wilson, Qurat Ul Ain, Canan Ozkaya, Avni Amin, Claudia García-Moreno, Allen Thurston, Alison Mackenzie, Susan Lagdon, Patrick Stark, Maria Lohan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aoibheann Brennan-WilsonSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-6238
Qurat Ul AinSchool of Social Sciences, Education, and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7199-110X
Canan OzkayaSchool of Social Sciences, Education, and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3003-8567
Avni AminDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3136-1218
Claudia García-MorenoDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-4119
Allen ThurstonSchool of Social Sciences, Education, and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-3257
Alison MackenzieSchool of Social Sciences, Education, and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7360-5639
Susan LagdonSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-2297
Patrick StarkSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2659-0865
Maria LohanSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK m.lohan@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3525-1283

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionViolence against women (VAW) during the COVID-19 pandemic was described as the 'shadow pandemic' with an increase in reports of VAW. As countries now focus on becoming more resilient to future pandemics, it is critical to understand what we learnt about evidence on VAW burden, prevention, and response during the COVID-19 pandemic. The WHO commissioned this scoping review to gain an understanding of the research evidence on VAW during COVID-19 and to inform future pandemic preparedness efforts.

methodsTerms relating to VAW and COVID-19 were used to search six databases between 1 January 2020 and 11 February 2023, inclusive of all study designs. Data on thematic focus (ie, burden of violence and/or interventions/services), types of violence, study design, study setting and participant characteristics were synthesised.

resultsOf 25 080 identified records, 694 publications were reviewed in full text and 419 publications were included. The majority (>95%) of the published research was devoted to documenting the burden of VAW, while only 6.2% studied solutions (interventions/services), with even less emphasis on identifying how to prevent VAW in a pandemic context (1%). Gaps in research on VAW that existed prior to the pandemic on women who face multiple intersecting forms of disadvantage endured. Outstanding also was the gap in research on digital-mediated violence (<5%), even as reports of online facilitated violence soared. Additionally, gaps in evidence on specific types of violence such as femicide, forced marriage and acid attacks persisted.

conclusionThat VAW will be a critical concern, and its impacts worsened during pandemics in the future is certain. The research community does not need to spend more on understanding the burden of forms of VAW but pivot to research to adapt and innovate how to deliver prevention and support services, especially to populations who are disproportionately impacted. In addition to addressing this broader gap in prevention and response during pandemics, further evidence is required on the specific area of technology-mediated violence, femicide, forced marriage and acid attacks.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleGender-Based ViolenceHumansPandemic PreparednessPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Public HealthReview

Identifiers

PMID39663125
PMCPMC11647320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.