Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663116›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

The Dimensionality of Neural Coding for Cognitive Control Is Gradually Transformed within the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Rocco Chiou, John Duncan, Elizabeth Jefferies, Matthew A Lambon Ralph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Resolving the Abstract-Concrete Paradox in the Angular Gyrus: A Multimethod Investigation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rocco ChiouMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 7EF, United Kingdom rocco.chiou@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3009-8075
John DuncanMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9695-2764
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, Yorkshire YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3826-4330
Matthew A Lambon RalphMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-2488

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control relies on neural representations that are inherently high-dimensional and distributed across multiple subregions in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Traditional approaches tackle prefrontal representation by reducing it into a unidimensional measure (univariate amplitude) or using it to distinguish a limited number of alternatives (pattern classification). In contrast, representational similarity analysis (RSA) enables flexibly formulating various hypotheses about informational contents underlying the neural codes, explicitly comparing hypotheses, and examining the representational alignment between brain regions. Here, we used a multifaceted paradigm wherein the difficulty of cognitive control was manipulated separately for five cognitive tasks. We used RSA to unveil representational contents, measure the representational alignment between regions, and quantify representational generality versus specificity. We found a graded transition in the lateral PFC: The dorsocaudal PFC was tuned to task difficulty (indexed by reaction times), preferentially connected with the parietal cortex, and representationally generalizable across domains. The ventrorostral PFC was tuned to the abstract structure of tasks, preferentially connected with the temporal cortex, and representationally specific. The middle PFC (interposed between the dorsocaudal and ventrorostral PFC) was tuned to individual task sets and ranked in the middle in terms of connectivity and generalizability. Furthermore, whether a region was dimensionally rich or sparse covaried with its functional profile: Low dimensionality (only gist) in the dorsocaudal PFC dovetailed with better generality, whereas high dimensionality (gist plus details) in the ventrorostral PFC corresponded with better ability to encode subtleties. Our findings, collectively, demonstrate how cognitive control is decomposed into distinct facets that transition steadily along prefrontal subregions.

Indexed as

CognitionPrefrontal CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adultcognitive controlconnectivitydimensionalitymultiple-demand networkprefrontal cortexsemantic cognition

Identifiers

PMID39663116
PMCPMC11800757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.