ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025
Correlation between Delayed Relief after Microvascular Decompression and Morphology of the Lateral Spread Response in Patients with Hemifacial Spasm-Temporal versus Mandibular Branch Stimulation.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconsidering the Pathophysiological Interpretation of Polyphasic LSRs in Hemifacial Spasm.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- Correlation between Delayed Relief after Microvascular Decompression and Morphology of the Lateral Spread Response in Patients with Hemifacial Spasm-Temporal versus Mandibular Branch Stimulation.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- The application value of intraoperative lateral spreading response monitoring during microvascular decompression in patients with primary hemifacial spasm.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Intraoperative use of lateral spread response measurement in the upper orbicularis oculi and mandibular muscles in patients with hemifacial spasm after botulinum toxin treatment.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although microvascular decompression (MVD) is a reliable treatment for hemifacial spasm (HFS), delayed postoperative relief is one of its main issues. We previously evaluated the morphology of the lateral spread response (LSR) and reported the correlation between delayed relief after MVD and polyphasic morphology of the LSR. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between the morphology of the LSR with stimulation of the temporal and mandibular branches of the facial nerve and delayed relief of persistent HFS after MVD. We retrospectively analysed and compared data from 49 of 205 consecutive patients who underwent MVD for HFS at our hospital between January 2015 and March 2022. Based on the pattern of the initial LSR morphology, patients were divided into 4 groups (LSR with temporal branch stimulation/LSR with mandibular branch stimulation; polyphasic/polyphasic group, polyphasic/monophasic group, monophasic/polyphasic group, monophasic/monophasic group). The results of MVD surgery for HFS were evaluated 1 week, 1 month and 1 year postoperatively, by evaluating whether or not the symptoms of HFS persisted at the time of each follow-up. We found significant differences in residual postoperative HFS 1 week postoperatively among the 4 groups (p < 0.05), as assessed using m*n Yates chi-square test. There is a significant correlation between delayed relief after MVD and polyphasic morphology of the initial LSR in patients with HFS. The LSR with temporal rather than mandibular branch stimulation might be useful for predicting delayed relief following MVD in HFS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.