ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025
Comparison of Early-onset Efficacy of Anti-calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies for Patients with Migraine in Real-world Clinical Practice: Study Protocol for an Exploratory Clinical Trial.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) are available in Japan: galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab. Early-onset efficacy has been demonstrated for each CGRP-mAb in comparison with placebo, but differences among the drugs are unclear. Only galcanezumab requires 2 doses at the initial injection. This study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-group comparison trial, consisting of the random selection of a CGRP-mAb and 6 consecutive injections, and then discontinuation of the CGRP-mAb after 6 injections. The primary outcome is a comparison of early-onset efficacy between galcanezumab and both fremanezumab and erenumab after the initial injection. The secondary outcomes are comparisons between galcanezumab and both fremanezumab and erenumab, and between fremanezumab and erenumab as follows: weekly number of headache days, migraine days, and acute medication use are compared to baseline during one month after initial injection; time of subjectively perceiving onset of effect after initial injection; monthly changes in headache status from baseline to after third (3rd) injections; effective rates after initial and 3rd injections; improvement rates of depression scores between baseline and after 3rd injections; changes in number of absenteeism and presenteeism days in each month from baseline to after 3rd injections; proportion of ineffective cases after 3rd injections; recurrence rates and time to recurrence after CGRP-mAb discontinuation; effective rates of CGRP-mAb re-injections; detection of clinical factors associated with effectiveness after the initial and 3rd injections. The aim of this study is to investigate differences in early-onset efficacy among the CGRP-mAbs, and when and to what extent headache symptoms recur after discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.