Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39662896›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Combining Topic Modeling, Sentiment Analysis, and Corpus Linguistics to Analyze Unstructured Web-Based Patient Experience Data: Case Study of Modafinil Experiences.

Julia Walsh, Jonathan Cave, Frances Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia Walsh *Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9787-0349
Jonathan Cave *Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9879-6507
Frances Griffiths *Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4173-1438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient experience data from social media offer patient-centered perspectives on disease, treatments, and health service delivery. Current guidelines typically rely on systematic reviews, while qualitative health studies are often seen as anecdotal and nongeneralizable. This study explores combining personal health experiences from multiple sources to create generalizable evidence.

objectiveThe study aims to (1) investigate how combining unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) and corpus linguistics can explore patient perspectives from a large unstructured dataset of modafinil experiences, (2) compare findings with Cochrane meta-analyses on modafinil's effectiveness, and (3) develop a methodology for analyzing such data.

methodsUsing 69,022 posts from 790 sources, we used a variety of NLP and corpus techniques to analyze the data, including data cleaning techniques to maximize post context, Python for NLP techniques, and Sketch Engine for linguistic analysis. We used multiple topic mining approaches, such as latent Dirichlet allocation, nonnegative matrix factorization, and word-embedding methods. Sentiment analysis used TextBlob and Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner, while corpus methods including collocation, concordance, and n-gram generation. Previous work had mapped topic mining to themes, such as health conditions, reasons for taking modafinil, symptom impacts, dosage, side effects, effectiveness, and treatment comparisons.

resultsKey findings of the study included modafinil use across 166 health conditions, most frequently narcolepsy, multiple sclerosis, attention-deficit disorder, anxiety, sleep apnea, depression, bipolar disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and chronic disease. Word-embedding topic modeling mapped 70% of posts to predefined themes, while sentiment analysis revealed 65% positive responses, 6% neutral responses, and 28% negative responses. Notably, the perceived effectiveness of modafinil for various conditions strongly contrasts with the findings of existing randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, which conclude insufficient or low-quality evidence of effectiveness.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the value of combining NLP with linguistic techniques for analyzing large unstructured text datasets. Despite varying opinions, findings were methodologically consistent and challenged existing clinical evidence. This suggests that patient-generated data could potentially provide valuable insights into treatment outcomes, potentially improving clinical understanding and patient care.

Indexed as

LinguisticsModafinilNatural Language ProcessingData MiningHumansInternetSocial MediaModafinilcorpus linguisticsmodafinilnatural language processingNLPpatient experiencesentiment analysissocial media datatopic modelingunstructured textunsupervised

Identifiers

PMID39662896
PMCPMC11669883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.