Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39662889›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2024

Social risk factors and cancer prevention care among patients in community health-care settings.

Matthew P Banegas, Jean O'Malley, Jorge Kaufmann, Miguel Marino, Laura M Gottlieb, Nathalie Huguet, Adjoa Anyane-Yeboa, Rachel Gold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew P BanegasCenter for Health Equity Education and Research, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6158-7162
Jean O'MalleyOCHIN, Inc, Portland, OR 97228, United States.
Jorge KaufmannDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1516-4636
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-4478
Laura M GottliebSocial Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2669-4066
Nathalie HuguetDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4064-1553
Adjoa Anyane-YeboaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Rachel GoldOCHIN, Inc, Portland, OR 97228, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6326-5012

Funding

Research ProgramP50CA244289 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, RACHEL · 2019 to 2023
$7.6M
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health P50CA244289NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial risks are negatively associated with receipt of cancer preventive care. As knowledge is lacking on the pathways underlying these associations, we investigated associations between patient-reported social risks and colorectal cancer (CRC), cervical cancer, and breast cancer screening order provision and screening completion.

methodsThis study included patients eligible for CRC, cervical cancer, or breast cancer screening at 186 community-based clinics between July 1, 2015, and February 29, 2020. Outcomes included up-to-date status for indicated cancer screenings at baseline; percentage of subsequent study months in which patients were up-to-date on screenings; screening order receipt; and screening completion. Independent variables were patient-reported food insecurity, transportation barriers, and housing instability. Analyses used covariate-adjusted generalized estimating equation models, stratified by social risk.

resultsPatients with documented social risks were less likely to be up-to-date on any cancer screening at baseline and in most cases had a lower rate of total study months up-to-date on screenings. All cancer screenings were ordered less often for food-insecure patients. Cervical cancer screening was ordered less often for transportation-insecure patients. The likelihood of completing a screening test differed statistically significantly by select social risks: Cervical cancer and CRC screening rates were lower among food-insecure patients, and CRC screening rates were lower among transportation-insecure patients. The likelihood of breast cancer screening completion did not differ by social risk status.

conclusionSocial risks affect both the ordering and the receipt of cancer screening. Research is needed on strategies to mitigate the impact of different social risks on cancer early-detection services.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFood InsecurityUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHousingHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTransportation

Identifiers

PMID39662889
PMCPMC11668512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.