ReviewJournal of innate immunity2025
Does Adenosine Triphosphate via Purinergic Receptor Signalling Fuel Pulmonary Fibrosis?
Review in Journal of innate immunity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adenosine Signaling as a Central Integrative Network in Cellular Stress Responses and a Therapeutically Actionable Target in Human Disease.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Longitudinal change of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy-associated interstitial lung disease on high-resolution computed tomography, a prospective cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Role of Pannexin 1, P2X7, and CFTR in ATP Release and Autocrine Signaling by Principal Cells of the Epididymis.Function (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterstitial lung diseases (ILD) are poorly understood disorders characterised by diffuse damage to the lung parenchyma, with inflammation and fibrosis. Some manifest a progressive fibrotic phenotype with high fatality and limited treatment options, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. SUMMARY: The degree to which inflammation plays a role in fibrosis progression is unknown. However, wound healing and fibrosis are intricate processes influenced by various inflammatory factors. Extracellular nucleosides and nucleotides, including adenosine triphosphate, activate pro-inflammatory responses to innate immunity and are widely implicated in tissue fibrosis across different organs. The pro-inflammatory effects of extracellular nucleotides occur via P1 and P2 purinergic receptors, expressed across the lung and immune system, and have been implicated in various pulmonary diseases including pulmonary fibrosis. This review amalgamates available data on the complex role of P1 and P2 purinergic receptor signalling in pulmonary fibrosis and discusses perspectives for novel treatments. KEY MESSAGES: Purinergic signalling plays a complex and pivotal role in pulmonary fibrosis, warranting further study. The intricate interplay between P1 and P2 receptor pathways necessitates a comprehensive approach to understand their collective impact. While evidence from preclinical models is promising, human studies are essential for further understanding of pulmonary fibrosis. Advances in receptor-specific agonists and antagonists provide novel avenues for research and may ultimately lead to new therapies for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.