ArticleOphthalmic research2025
Clinical and Biometric Factors Associated with Prediction Errors Related to Lens Position in Vitrectomized Patients.
Article in Ophthalmic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of the study was to evaluate clinical and biometric factors leading to a prediction error related to lens position in pars plana vitrectomy.
methodsThis study was conducted as a consecutive retrospective case series at the Department of Ophthalmology, Montpellier University Hospital. All medical files and PCI biometrical reports from a single surgeon were reviewed from 2017 to 2019. Patients who had phacoemulsification with the ASPHINA 509 MP® intraocular lens were selected and stratified into 3 groups: phacoemulsification alone (group 1), phacoemulsification and vitrectomy with gas tamponade (group 2), and phacoemulsification and vitrectomy without tamponade (group 3). Clinical factors and biometry factors from initial and final biometry were collected. Refractive error, actual lens position, C constant, axial length delta, and pre-operative and post-operative anterior and posterior segment variation parameters were calculated.
resultsA total of 140 eyes were analyzed, 90 in group 1, and 25 in group 2 and 3. The mean prediction error was 0.10 ± 0.55 D (group 1); -0.36 ± 0.74 D (group 2); and -0.12 ± 0.54 D (group 3) with p < 0.05 for group 1 vs. group 2. The mean actual lens position was 5.25 ± 0.29 mm; 5.66 ± 0.60 mm; and 5.50 ± 0.43 mm for the 3 groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Axial length delta was -0.10 ± 0.13 mm in group 1, -0.062 ± 0.20 mm in group 2, and -0.022 ± 0.17 mm in group 3 (p = 0.015). Multilinear regression analysis found a significant and independent influence of vitrectomy and gas tamponade on prediction error.
conclusionMyopic shift in the case of vitrectomy is multifactorial, effective lens position is modified by vitrectomy and vitreous refractive index is changing. The integration of these data in formulas may improve refractive outcome after cataract and vitrectomy surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.