Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661978›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024

Success Factors of Growth-Stage Digital Health Companies: Systematic Literature Review.

Estelle Pfitzer, Laura Bitomsky, Marcia Nißen, Christoph Kausch, Tobias Kowatsch

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A longitudinal analysis of quality and longevity of mental health apps indexed in MIND, the largest database.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Equity by design principles for digital health interventions.International journal for equity in health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Estelle PfitzerCentre for Digital Health Interventions, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0006-0577-2757
Laura BitomskyCentre for Digital Health Interventions, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-9545-0268
Marcia NißenCentre for Digital Health Interventions, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-8825
Christoph KauschMTIP AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-3137-3161
Tobias KowatschCentre for Digital Health Interventions, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5939-4145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade, digital health technologies (DHTs) have grown rapidly, driven by innovations such as electronic health records and accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased funding and regulatory support have further pushed the sector's expansion. Despite early success, many DHT companies struggle to scale, with notable examples like Pear Therapeutics and Proteus Digital Health, which both declared bankruptcy after initial breakthroughs. These cases highlight the challenges of sustaining growth in a highly regulated health care environment. While there is research on success factors across industries, a gap remains in understanding the specific challenges faced by growth-stage DHT companies.

objectiveThis study aims to identify and discuss key factors that make growth-stage DHT companies successful. Specifically, we address three questions: (1) What are the success factors of growth-stage digital companies in general and (2) digital health companies in particular? (3) How do these success factors vary across DHTs?

methodsFollowing established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted to answer the questions. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using management and medical literature databases: EBSCO, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The review spanned scientific articles published from 2000 to 2023, using a rigorous screening process and quality assessment using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist.

resultsFrom the 2972 studies initially screened, 36 were selected, revealing 52 success factors. We categorized them into internal factor categories (Product and Services, Operations, Business Models, and Team Composition) and external factor categories (Customers, Health Care System, Government and Regulators, Investors and Shareholders, Suppliers and Partners, and Competitors). Of the 52 factors, 19 were specific to DHT companies. The most frequently cited internal success factors included financial viability (n=18) and market demand and relevance of the product and service (n=13). External success factors emphasized the regulatory environment and policy framework (n=15). Key differences were observed between DHTs and broader digital companies in areas such as data security (P=.03), system interoperability (P=.01), and regulatory alignment (P=.02), with DHTs showing a higher frequency of these factors. In addition, success factors varied across different DHT categories. Health System Operational Software companies emphasized affordability and system integration, while Digital Therapeutics prioritized factors related to government regulations and regulatory approval.

conclusionsEssential characteristics contributing to the success of growth-stage digital health companies have been identified. This work, therefore, fills a knowledge gap and provides relevant stakeholders, including investors and entrepreneurs, with a valuable resource that can support informed decision-making in investment decisions and, in turn, enhance the success of fast-growing digital health companies. In addition, it provides the research community with a direction for future studies, enhancing the understanding, implementation, and growth of DHTs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1101/2024.05.06.24306674.

Indexed as

COVID-19Digital HealthDigital TechnologyElectronic Health RecordsHumansTelemedicineclinical softwaresdigital healthdigital therapeuticsEHRelectronic health recordsfundinggrowth-stage companieshealth companieshealth information technologystakeholderssubstance use disordersuccess factorssystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID39661978
PMCPMC11669886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.