Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661925›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2025

Qualitative Study of Health Care Team Perception of the Benefits and Limitations of Remote Symptom Monitoring.

Emma K Hendrix, Nicole L Henderson, Tanvi V Padalkar, Tara Kaufmann, Stacey A Ingram, D'Ambra N Dent, Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang, J Nicholas Odom, Bryan J Weiner, Doris Howell and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient and staff experiences with an EHR-Integrated Symptom Management Program (eSyM) in oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Roles undertaken by family caregivers to help individuals with cancer manage symptoms: a qualitative study of caregivers, patients, and oncology clinicians.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Emma K HendrixDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0009-0008-4978-2425
Nicole L HendersonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0003-2101-3065
Tanvi V PadalkarDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0009-0009-3605-360X
Tara KaufmannDell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-8875-9462
Stacey A IngramDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
D'Ambra N DentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Chao-Hui Sylvia HuangO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-4690-7682
J Nicholas OdomO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-0254
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-6996-9480
Doris HowellSupportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0683-8715
Angela M StoverLinebarger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-0983-686X
Ethan M BaschLinebarger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-3813-9318
Chelsea McGowanUSA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL.
Jennifer Young PierceUSA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL.ORCID 0000-0001-5271-7669
Gabrielle B RocqueDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0003-4188-9785

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Omer Jamy · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UM1TR004406 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2023 to 2026
$37.5M
UAB Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program (T32)T32CA047888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Ritu Aneja, Ellen Mary Lavoie Smith · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-delivered ePRO home symptom monitoring and managementR01NR019058 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ROCQUE, GABRIELLE · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004406NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS T32 CA047888NINR NIH HHS R01 NR019058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRemote symptom monitoring (RSM) using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROS) connects patients and health care teams between appointments. Patient-perceived benefits and drawbacks of RSM are well-known, but health care team members' perceptions are less clear.

methodsHealth care team members from the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the University of South Alabama Health Mitchell Cancer Institute participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews to explore their experiences and perspectives on RSM benefits and limitations. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed inductively using NVivo software to identify recurring themes and exemplary quotes.

resultsThirty oncology health care team members, including physicians (n = 9), nurse practitioners (n = 2), nurses (n = 8), nonclinical navigators (n = 7), and administrators (n = 4), were interviewed. Findings were organized into five major themes: three benefits (

conclusionAlthough health care team members recognized the benefits of RSM as a standard of care, future work is necessary to address identified limitations to support wide-scale implementation of RSM in oncology practices.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID39661925
PMCPMC12152210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.