ArticleJCO oncology practice2025
Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Tailored Risk Communication and Navigation for Hereditary Genetic Risk Assessment Uptake: Economic Evaluation From the Genetic Risk Assessment for Cancer Education and Empowerment Trial.
Article in JCO oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Genetic Risk Assessment for Cancer Education and Empowerment Project demonstrated that tailored counseling and navigation (TCN) substantially increased the rate of genetic evaluation (GE) in women with high-risk breast or ovarian cancer (odds ratio, 8.9 [95% CI, 3.4 to 23.5] for TCN
methodsWe identified the components of the intervention and downstream outcomes which would result in resource use. We assessed time spent by staff, cost of mailings, cost of patient time, and cost of testing and counseling in 6 months. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for outcomes of interest. We assessed the sensitivity of our results to assumptions via one-way sensitivity analyses. In addition, we assessed how results would change if a higher volume of patients was given TCN, with a health coach working full-time.
resultsTCN costs $68,924 in US dollars (USD) to deliver per 212 patients, or $325 USD per patient. The intervention cost was $2,154 USD per record-verified GE. Much of this was attributed to training costs for health coaches ($50,223 USD). When including testing and counseling, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of TCN versus UC was $3,250 USD per additional GE. This was most sensitive to TCN effectiveness (ie, GE rate in TCN patients) and cost of testing. Cost-effectiveness would be more favorable with higher coaching volume (ICER of $1,730 USD/GE).
conclusionImplementing TCN in a clinic setting would come with notable costs, and current reimbursement policies for telemedicine may not be sufficient. Cost-effectiveness of TCN can be improved if subsequent interventions are more efficacious or are delivered to greater patient volumes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.