ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2024
Adverse events and safety concerns among university students who misused stimulants to increase academic performance.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate psychostimulant drug use among academics in the health area of a higher education institution in Minas Gerais, Brazil.
methodsWe conducted an online cross-sectional study of 389 university students from various health-related fields. This study used a questionnaire to investigate the social and behavioral aspects associated with using psychostimulants.
resultsThe prevalence of psychostimulant use was 21%, primarily in men (23.07%), medicine students (19.70%), and psychology students (18.91%). Methylphenidate was the most commonly used drug (57%). Concomitant use of psychostimulants was reported in 37% and 35% of participants who started using them during graduation. A justifiable medical diagnosis was reported by 65% of the participants; however, a large portion had no indication for their use, and 77% acquired the medication without a medical prescription. The most frequently reported effects by users included lack of appetite (68%), tachycardia (58%), insomnia (43.5%), and agitation (50%). More than 70% of users also reported concurrent use of alcohol and illicit drugs, as well as depression and anxiety, which are contraindications for psychostimulant use. Additionally, 75% of students reported using psychostimulants for neuroenhancement purposes, with the majority (52%) perceiving their course performance as good and believing that it would be different without the drug (75.8%).
conclusionPsychostimulant use in the study population revealed significant risks, including a lack of a valid diagnosis, unsupervised use, drug interactions, and side effects. Therefore, the data obtained in this study may contribute to the development of educational policies focused on preventing and controlling the indiscriminate use of these medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.