Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661859›Full record

ReviewEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2024

Current landscape of clinical use of ex vivo expanded natural killer cells for cancer therapy.

Júlia Teixeira Cottas de Azevedo, Juliana Aparecida Preto de Godoy, Cláudia de Souza, Micheli Severo Sielski, Larissa Leggieri Coa, Augusto Barbosa Júnior, Lucila Nassif Kerbauy, Andrea Tiemi Kondo, Oswaldo Keith Okamoto, Nelson Hamerschlak and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Júlia Teixeira Cottas de AzevedoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3864-7796
Juliana Aparecida Preto de GodoyHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1276-4297
Cláudia de SouzaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5747-8895
Micheli Severo SielskiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-7954
Larissa Leggieri CoaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1764-473X
Augusto Barbosa JúniorHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8923-4238
Lucila Nassif KerbauyHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-9098
Andrea Tiemi KondoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4228-8503
Oswaldo Keith OkamotoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-6225
Nelson HamerschlakHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-5310
José Mauro KutnerHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-6731
Raquel de Melo Alves PaivaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2418-4863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural Killer cells are immune leukocytes required for responses against tumor cells and virus-infected cells. In the last decade, natural killer cells have emerged as promising tools in cancer therapy, and clinical studies on patients treated with natural killer cells have revealed increased rates of disease-free survival. In this article, we review results from the major clinical trials that have used natural killer cells for cancer treatment, including their global distribution. We also discuss the major mechanisms of natural killer cell activation and expansion and focus on the advantages and disadvantages of each mechanism for clinical applications. Although natural killer cells can be isolated from several sources, primary natural killer cells are most commonly used in clinical trials. However, the frequency of natural killer cells available in peripheral and cord blood is low, necessitating development of methods for expansion of natural killer cells for clinical use. The development of a platform for the expansion of large-scale good manufacturing practice-compliant natural killer cells has limitations as several methods for natural killer cell activation and expansion yield conflicting results. Only techniques using feeder cells can produce large numbers of cells, allowing the "off-the-shelf" use of natural killer cells. However, advances in cell culture have supported the development of feeder-free platforms for natural killer cell expansion, which is fundamental for improving the safety of this type of cell therapy.

Indexed as

Killer Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsCell Culture TechniquesClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunotherapy, Adoptive

Identifiers

PMID39661859
PMCPMC11634336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.