SynthesisEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2024
Chemical transdifferentiation of somatic cells to neural cells: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing neurogenic differentiation of dental stem cells: a critical review of induction strategies and functional validation.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTransdifferentiation is the conversion of a specific somatic cell into another cell type, bypassing a transient pluripotent state. This implies a faster method to generate cells of interest with the additional benefit of reduced tumorigenic risk for clinical use.
objectiveWe describe protocols that use small molecules as direct conversion inducers, without the need for exogenous factors, to evaluate the potential of cell transdifferentiation for pharmacological and clinical applications.
methodsIn this systematic review, using PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a personalized search strategy in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web Of Science), looking for experimental works that used exclusively small molecules for transdifferentiation of non-neural cell types into neural lineage cells.
resultsWe explored the main biological mechanisms involved in direct cell conversion induced by different small molecules used in 33 experimental in vitro and in vitro transdifferentiation protocols. We also summarize the main characteristics of these protocols, such as the chemical cocktails used, time for transdifferentiation, and conversion efficiency.
conclusionSmall molecules-based protocols for neuronal transdifferentiation are reasonably safe, economical, accessible, and are a promising alternative for future use in regenerative medicine and pharmacology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.