ArticleBrazilian oral research2024
Fractal analysis and assessment of lacunarity in mandibular osteoradionecrosis: a cross-sectional study with control group.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Fractal Analysis on Orthopantomography Images of Bone Remodeling Changes at 3 Months Between Natural Socket Healing and Immediate Implant Placement.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity of the mandibular bone, comparing patients with and without osteoradionecrosis (ORN). In a cross-sectional study with a control group, 25 patients were included and divided into a case group (with ORN, n = 14) and a control group (without ORN, n = 11). A digital panoramic radiograph taken after the end of radiotherapy (RT) was evaluated for each patient. FD and lacunarity of the mandibular bone were determined using ImageJ software. Descriptive, bivariate, and ROC curve analyses were performed. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated. Significance was established at p < 0.05. The mean FD and lacunarity values were not significantly different between the groups. The area under the curve for FD and lacunarity were 0.579 and 0.661, respectively. The cut-off point for FD was ≤1.1714 and for lacunarity, > 0.3821, correctly classifying the majority of cases and controls. Most participants in the case group (63.6%) had a FD ≤ 1.1714 and the majority of participants in the control group (63.6%) had a FD >1.1714 (p = 0.395). For lacunarity, most individuals in the case group (72.7%) had a value > 0.3821 and most participants in the control group (63.6%) had a value ≤ 0.3821 (p = 0.198). In conclusion, the FD and lacunarity values did not show statistically significant differences between patients with and without ORN. However, the moderate and large magnitude of the effects seem to indicate that the results may be clinically relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.