ArticleBrazilian oral research2024
Tissue response and expression of interleukins (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-10 after pulp capping with bioglasses in mice.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of dentin pre-treatment with Bioglass F18 suspensions on surface characteristics and bond strength of endodontic sealers.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Histological Tissue Response to Calcium Silicate-Based Cements Assessed in Human Tooth Culture Models: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the pulp response to F18 and cobalt-doped F18 bioglass (F18Co) in comparison with calcium hydroxide (CH) after pulp capping. The maxillary first molars of 48 rats were divided into F18, F18Co, CH, and control (no intervention) groups. The pulp was exposed, the materials were placed, and the teeth were capped. After 7 and 15 days, the animals were euthanized for pulp evaluation and interleukin (IL) expression determination. Statistical analysis was carried out using the SigmaPlot® program (Systat Software Inc., for Windows, version 12.0). The data obtained in the analyses were subjected to the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's test. For all tests, statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The CH group exhibited mild to moderate inflammation, whereas the bioglass groups displayed moderate to severe inflammation, indicating a notable difference between the control and bioglass groups. At 7 days, both the CH and most of the bioglass specimens showed moderate disorganization. On day 15, CH displayed mildto-moderate disorganization, whereas F18 and F18Co exhibited significantly more moderate-to-severe disorganization. There were no significant differences in IL-6 and IL-10 expressions between groups at 7 days, but a noteworthy increase in IL-1β was observed in both CH and F18. After 15 days, there was a greater expression of IL-6 and IL-1β in the bioglass groups. No significant IL-10 expression was observed. Bioglass performed less effectively than CH when in direct contact with the pulp tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.