Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661723›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2024

DOME Registry: implementing community-wide recommendations for reporting supervised machine learning in biology.

Omar Abdelghani Attafi, Damiano Clementel, Konstantinos Kyritsis, Emidio Capriotti, Gavin Farrell, Styliani-Christina Fragkouli, Leyla Jael Castro, András Hatos, Tom Lenaerts, Stanislav Mazurenko and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Structural bioinformatics for rational drug design.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Omar Abdelghani AttafiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-2327-9430
Damiano ClementelDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7395-2921
Konstantinos KyritsisInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki 570 01, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8035-341X
Emidio CapriottiDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2323-0963
Gavin FarrellELIXIR Hub, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5166-8551
Styliani-Christina FragkouliInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki 570 01, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4067-7123
Leyla Jael CastroZB Med Information Centre for Life Sciences, Cologne 50931, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3986-0510
András HatosDepartment of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9224-9820
Tom LenaertsInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles-Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-1455
Stanislav MazurenkoLoschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Brno 62500, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3659-4819
Soroush MozaffariDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.
Franco PradelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7152-5512
Patrick RuchHES-SO-HEG Geneva, Geneva 1227, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-2962
Castrense SavojardoDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7359-0633
Paola TurinaDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9174-511X
Federico ZambelliDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3487-4331
Damiano PiovesanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8210-2390
Alexander Miguel MonzonDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0362-8218
Fotis PsomopoulosInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki 570 01, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0222-4273
Silvio C E TosattoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4525-7793

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology CA21160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supervised machine learning (ML) is used extensively in biology and deserves closer scrutiny. The Data Optimization Model Evaluation (DOME) recommendations aim to enhance the validation and reproducibility of ML research by establishing standards for key aspects such as data handling and processing, optimization, evaluation, and model interpretability. The recommendations help to ensure that key details are reported transparently by providing a structured set of questions. Here, we introduce the DOME registry (URL: registry.dome-ml.org), a database that allows scientists to manage and access comprehensive DOME-related information on published ML studies. The registry uses external resources like ORCID, APICURON, and the Data Stewardship Wizard to streamline the annotation process and ensure comprehensive documentation. By assigning unique identifiers and DOME scores to publications, the registry fosters a standardized evaluation of ML methods. Future plans include continuing to grow the registry through community curation, improving the DOME score definition and encouraging publishers to adopt DOME standards, and promoting transparency and reproducibility of ML in the life sciences.

Indexed as

RegistriesSupervised Machine LearningDatabases, FactualHumansReproducibility of Resultsmachine learningreproducibilitystandardstransparency

Identifiers

PMID39661723
PMCPMC11633452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.