Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661599›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

Genome size influences plant growth and biodiversity responses to nutrient fertilization in diverse grassland communities.

Joseph A Morton, Carlos Alberto Arnillas, Lori Biedermann, Elizabeth T Borer, Lars A Brudvig, Yvonne M Buckley, Marc W Cadotte, Kendi Davies, Ian Donohue, Anne Ebeling and 16 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Joseph A MortonSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4400-4575
Carlos Alberto ArnillasDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lori BiedermannDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Elizabeth T BorerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Lars A BrudvigDepartment of Plant Biology and Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Yvonne M BuckleySchool of Natural Sciences, Zoology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Marc W CadotteDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kendi DaviesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Ian DonohueSchool of Natural Sciences, Zoology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Anne EbelingInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Nico EisenhauerGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena- Leipzig (iDiv), Leipzig, Germany.
Catalina EstradaDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, United Kingdom.
Sylvia HaiderInstitute of Ecology, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Yann HautierDepartment of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Anke JentschDepartment of Disturbance Ecology, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Holly MartinsonDepartment of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, Maryland, United States of America.
Rebecca L McCulleyDepartment of Plant & Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Xavier RaynaudSorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, INRA, Université Paris-Cité, UPEC, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Sorbonne Université - Paris, France.
Christiane RoscherGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena- Leipzig (iDiv), Leipzig, Germany.
Eric W SeabloomDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Carly J StevensLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Katerina VeselaSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Alison WallaceDepartment of Biosciences, Minnesota State University Moorhead, Minnesota, United States of America.
Ilia J LeitchDepartment of Trait Diversity and Function, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Andrew R LeitchSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Erika I Hersch-GreenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3887-0768

Funding

NSF NSF‐DEB‐1042132NSF NSF‐DEB‐1234162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments comparing diploids with polyploids and in single grassland sites show that nitrogen and/or phosphorus availability influences plant growth and community composition dependent on genome size; specifically, plants with larger genomes grow faster under nutrient enrichments relative to those with smaller genomes. However, it is unknown if these effects are specific to particular site localities with speciifc plant assemblages, climates, and historical contingencies. To determine the generality of genome size-dependent growth responses to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization, we combined genome size and species abundance data from 27 coordinated grassland nutrient addition experiments in the Nutrient Network that occur in the Northern Hemisphere across a range of climates and grassland communities. We found that after nitrogen treatment, species with larger genomes generally increased more in cover compared to those with smaller genomes, potentially due to a release from nutrient limitation. Responses were strongest for C3 grasses and in less seasonal, low precipitation environments, indicating that genome size effects on water-use-efficiency modulates genome size-nutrient interactions. Cumulatively, the data suggest that genome size is informative and improves predictions of species' success in grassland communities.

Indexed as

BiodiversityGenome SizeGrasslandNitrogenFertilizersGenome, PlantNutrientsPhosphorusPlant DevelopmentPoaceaeFertilizersNitrogenNutrientsPhosphorus

Identifiers

PMID39661599
PMCPMC11633961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.