Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661585›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Stunting and academic trajectory in urban settings of Burkina Faso.

Rabi Joël Gansaonré, Lynne Moore, Jean-François Kobiané, Aly Sié, Slim Haddad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rabi Joël GansaonréFaculté de Médecine, Département de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6199-1771
Lynne MooreFaculté de Médecine, Département de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Jean-François KobianéInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Aly SiéCentre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Nouna, Burkina Faso.
Slim HaddadVITAM-Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable de l'Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpaired growth in childhood can lead to poor cognitive development and low school performance. However, literature on the effects of stunting on school trajectory is very limited. The primary objective of this research was to estimate the age at which children start school according to levels of height-for-age z-score (stunting). A second objective was to estimate the gain in terms of age at school entry associated with an improvement in height-for-age z-score. A third objective was to explore the relationship between stunting, grade repetition, and school dropout.

methodsWe used longitudinal data from the Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso) Health and Demographic Surveillance System. Data from a 2010 health survey of children under 5 years of age were merged with subsequent longitudinal schooling data. The study included 767 children globally who participated in the health and education surveys. Education data allowed us to apprehend academic trajectory measured by age at school entry, repetition, and dropout. The health survey gathered anthropometric information that was used to measure stunting. The adjusted age at school entry was estimated using a Poisson model. The gain represents the difference in adjusted age at school entry for different values of height-for-age. The relationship between stunting and grade repetition and dropout was studied using a discrete-time survival model.

resultsResults showed that children entered school on average at 5.7 years old, and the incidence of grade repetition and dropout was 17.7 and 6.6 per 100 persons-years, respectively. The adjusted age at school entry of severely stunted children was 6.2 years [95% confidence intervals (CI): 6.1; 6.3] compared to 5.1 years [95% CI: 5.0; 5.3] for children who had normal growth. The difference (gain) in adjusted age at school entry between severely and non-stunted children was thus 1.06 [95% CI: 0.87; 1.25] years. If a child's growth changed from severe stunting to normal growth, their risk of repeating a grade decreased by 5.0 [95% CI: 0.0; 9.0] per 100 persons-years. We did not observe a relationship between height-for-age and dropout.

conclusionThe results show that schooling is affected in several ways for children who are stunted. The age at school entry of stunted children is more likely to be delayed. Also, being stunted is associated with higher incidence of grade repetition. However, the relationship between stunting and dropout was inconclusive.

Indexed as

Growth DisordersBody HeightBurkina FasoChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleSchoolsUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID39661585
PMCPMC11633982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.