Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661458›Full record

Trial reportEye & contact lens2025

Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction by Classical Eyelid Hygiene Measures With and Without Additional Lipid Substitution for Tear Film Stabilization.

Isabel Weinstein, Augustin Kelava, Dieter Dausch, Berthold Seitz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Eye & contact lens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabel WeinsteinDepartment of Ophthalmology (I.W., B.S.), Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany; Methods Center (A.K.), Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany; and Praxis Prof. Dr. Dieter Dausch (D.D.), Amberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1590-4868
Augustin Kelava
Dieter Dausch
Berthold Seitz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to document the treatment success of eyelid hygiene with liposomal suspension using new diagnostic tools and to determine whether additional lipid substitution provided measurable benefits in meibomian gland dysfunction.

methodsA single-center controlled, partially single masked study was conducted. Group A used eyelid hygiene only, whereas group B additionally applied a liposomal eye spray. Subjective perception using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, measurement of tear film osmolarity, noninvasive tear film break-up time, assessment of the lipid layer, meibography, inspection of lid margins, assessment of the meibomian glands, and measurement of matrix-metallopeptidase-9 were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks.

resultsEighty-two patients were included and randomized into two groups. Both groups showed a decrease in OSDI score ( P <0.001), an increase in lipid layer thickness ( P <0.001), significant improvement in the degree of loss of meibomian glands ( P <0.001), in the damage pattern of the eyelid margins ( P <0.001), in the quality of meibomian gland secretion, and in matrix-metallopeptidase-9 after 12 weeks.

conclusionsOur study confirms the success of treatment with eyelid hygiene measures using a liposomal suspension. The additional benefit of lipid substitution was not significant after 12 weeks of treatment.

Indexed as

HygieneLipidsMeibomian Gland DysfunctionMeibomian GlandsTearsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLiposomesMaleMiddle AgedOsmolar ConcentrationSingle-Blind MethodLipidsLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID39661458
PMCPMC11850009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.