Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661433›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

EyeGPT for Patient Inquiries and Medical Education: Development and Validation of an Ophthalmology Large Language Model.

Xiaolan Chen, Ziwei Zhao, Weiyi Zhang, Pusheng Xu, Yue Wu, Mingpu Xu, Le Gao, Yinwen Li, Xianwen Shang, Danli Shi and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A multi-layer retrieval-augmented large language model framework for enhancing hypertension education.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  12. ChatGPT in precision medicine.APL bioengineering · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaolan Chen *School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1581-5045
Ziwei Zhao *School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0009-0008-4551-348X
Weiyi ZhangSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0009-0008-2780-9121
Pusheng XuSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-4822
Yue WuSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0009-0004-8283-3854
Mingpu XuSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0052-0837
Le GaoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0006-7494-1315
Yinwen LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital (Shanghai First People's Hospital), School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4254-0972
Xianwen ShangSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2362-3222
Danli ShiSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6094-137X
Mingguang HeSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-2810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge language models (LLMs) have the potential to enhance clinical flow and improve medical education, but they encounter challenges related to specialized knowledge in ophthalmology.

objectiveThis study aims to enhance ophthalmic knowledge by refining a general LLM into an ophthalmology-specialized assistant for patient inquiries and medical education.

methodsWe transformed Llama2 into an ophthalmology-specialized LLM, termed EyeGPT, through the following 3 strategies: prompt engineering for role-playing, fine-tuning with publicly available data sets filtered for eye-specific terminology (83,919 samples), and retrieval-augmented generation leveraging a medical database and 14 ophthalmology textbooks. The efficacy of various EyeGPT variants was evaluated by 4 board-certified ophthalmologists through comprehensive use of 120 diverse category questions in both simple and complex question-answering scenarios. The performance of the best EyeGPT model was then compared with that of the unassisted human physician group and the EyeGPT+human group. We proposed 4 metrics for assessment: accuracy, understandability, trustworthiness, and empathy. The proportion of hallucinations was also reported.

resultsThe best fine-tuned model significantly outperformed the original Llama2 model at providing informed advice (mean 9.30, SD 4.42 vs mean 13.79, SD 5.70; P<.001) and mitigating hallucinations (97/120, 80.8% vs 53/120, 44.2%, P<.001). Incorporating information retrieval from reliable sources, particularly ophthalmology textbooks, further improved the model's response compared with solely the best fine-tuned model (mean 13.08, SD 5.43 vs mean 15.14, SD 4.64; P=.001) and reduced hallucinations (71/120, 59.2% vs 57/120, 47.4%, P=.02). Subgroup analysis revealed that EyeGPT showed robustness across common diseases, with consistent performance across different users and domains. Among the variants, the model integrating fine-tuning and book retrieval ranked highest, closely followed by the combination of fine-tuning and the manual database, standalone fine-tuning, and pure role-playing methods. EyeGPT demonstrated competitive capabilities in understandability and empathy when compared with human ophthalmologists. With the assistance of EyeGPT, the performance of the ophthalmologist was notably enhanced.

conclusionsWe pioneered and introduced EyeGPT by refining a general domain LLM and conducted a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of different strategies to develop an ophthalmology-specific assistant. Our results highlight EyeGPT's potential to assist ophthalmologists and patients in medical settings.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalOphthalmologyHumansLanguageEyeGPTgenerative AIgenerative artificial intelligencegenerative pretrained transformerlarge language modelmedical assistantophthalmologyretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID39661433
PMCPMC11669878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.