Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661385›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Development and Validation of a Smartphone Application for Neonatal Jaundice Screening.

Alvin Jia Hao Ngeow, Aminath Shiwaza Moosa, Mary Grace Tan, Lin Zou, Millie Ming Rong Goh, Gek Hsiang Lim, Vina Tagamolila, Imelda Ereno, Jared Ryan Durnford, Samson Kei Him Cheung and 16 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Alvin Jia Hao NgeowDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Aminath Shiwaza MoosaSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore.
Mary Grace TanDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Lin ZouSynapxe (formerly Integrated Health Information Systems, IHiS), Singapore.
Millie Ming Rong GohSynapxe (formerly Integrated Health Information Systems, IHiS), Singapore.
Gek Hsiang LimHealth Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Vina TagamolilaDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Imelda ErenoDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Jared Ryan DurnfordDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Samson Kei Him CheungDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Nicholas Wei Jie HongDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Ser Yee SohDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Yih Yann TayNursing Division, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Zi Ying ChangSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore.
Ruiheng OngSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore.
Li Ping Marianne TsangSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore.
Benny K L YipDepartment of Future Health System, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Kuok Wei ChiaDepartment of Future Health System, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Kelvin YapAxrail Private Limited, Singapore.
Ming Hwee LimDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Andy Wee An TaSynapxe (formerly Integrated Health Information Systems, IHiS), Singapore.
Han Leong GohSynapxe (formerly Integrated Health Information Systems, IHiS), Singapore.
Cheo Lian YeoDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Daisy Kwai Lin ChanDepartment of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Ngiap Chuan TanSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore.
BiliSG Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: This diagnostic study describes the merger of domain knowledge (Kramer principle of dermal advancement of icterus) with current machine learning (ML) techniques to create a novel tool for screening of neonatal jaundice (NNJ), which affects 60% of term and 80% of preterm infants. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a smartphone-based ML app to predict bilirubin (SpB) levels in multiethnic neonates using skin color analysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study was conducted between June 2022 and June 2024 at a tertiary hospital and 4 primary-care clinics in Singapore with a consecutive sample of neonates born at 35 or more weeks' gestation and within 21 days of birth. Exposure: The smartphone-based ML app captured skin images via the central aperture of a standardized color calibration sticker card from multiple regions of interest arranged in a cephalocaudal fashion, following the Kramer principle of dermal advancement of icterus. The ML model underwent iterative development and k-folds cross-validation, with performance assessed based on root mean squared error, Pearson correlation, and agreement with total serum bilirubin (TSB). The final ML model underwent temporal validation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Linear correlation and statistical agreement between paired SpB and TSB; sensitivity and specificity for detection of TSB equal to or greater than 17mg/dL with SpB equal to or greater than 13 mg/dL were assessed. Results: The smartphone-based ML app was validated on 546 neonates (median [IQR] gestational age, 38.0 [35.0-41.0] weeks; 286 [52.4%] male; 315 [57.7%] Chinese, 35 [6.4%] Indian, 169 [31.0%] Malay, and 27 [4.9%] other ethnicities). Iterative development and cross-validation was performed on 352 neonates. The final ML model (ensembled gradient boosted trees) incorporated yellowness indicators from the forehead, sternum, and abdomen. Temporal validation on 194 neonates yielded a Pearson r of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88; P < .001), 82% of data pairs within clinically acceptable limits of 3 mg/dL, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 70%, positive predictive value of 10%, negative predictive value of 100%, positive likelihood ratio of 3.3, negative likelihood ratio of 0, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96). Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study of a new smartphone-based ML app, there was good correlation and statistical agreement with TSB with sensitivity of 100%. The screening tool has the potential to be an NNJ screening tool, with treatment decisions based on TSB (reference standard). Further prospective studies are needed to establish the generalizability and cost-effectiveness of the screening tool in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

BilirubinJaundice, NeonatalMobile ApplicationsNeonatal ScreeningSmartphoneFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMachine LearningMaleSensitivity and SpecificitySingaporeBilirubin

Identifiers

PMID39661385
PMCPMC11635536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.