ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025
Access to Evaluation for Liver Transplantation in the Veterans Health Administration.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disparities in liver transplantation for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of transplantation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the largest US provider of cirrhosis care, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) is the ideal setting to assess patient-, clinician-, and site-level barriers to transplant evaluation.
aimsTo assess barriers to transplant evaluation referral among Veterans with cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsLogistic regression assessed facility, patient, clinical, and distance factors associated with transplant referral for Veterans with cirrhosis or HCC, over 1 year. VA clinicians were surveyed to understand barriers to transplant evaluation.
resultsOf 81,219 Veterans, 10% had HCC, 44% had compensated, low-MELD-Na (< 15) cirrhosis, 33% had MELD-Na > 15 or decompensated cirrhosis, and 13% had no recorded MELD-Na; 700 were referred for transplant evaluation over 1 year. Younger age, white race, being married, having fewer comorbidities, and having more severe disease or HCC were significantly associated with transplant referral. Distance to VA Transplant Center was associated with transplant referral for patients with HCC, but not for patients with cirrhosis and no HCC. Adding a random effect for facility variability reduced the importance of distance and facility complexity in models predicting referral for transplant evaluation and improved model fit. Among 196 clinician survey respondents, frequently cited transplant referral barriers included confusion about non-VA care, perceived complexity, and knowledge about processes and policies regarding alcohol, live donor transplant, and non-VA care.
conclusionMultiple site, clinician, and patient variables were associated with liver transplant referral probability. Identifying addressable barriers such as education for VA clinicians is a first step toward improving transplant referral for at-risk Veterans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39661277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.