ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2024
The Association Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surgical Attrition During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancies.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNeoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly used for gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers. Risk factors for surgical attrition during NT are poorly understood. A planned secondary analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing NT was performed to identify factors associated with surgical attrition.
methodsAdult patients with GI/HPB cancer receiving NT were provided a mobile phone application administering QOL assessments every 30 days and measuring mood/symptoms until NT completion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the association between demographic, clinical characteristics, and PROs with surgical attrition (no surgery (NS) versus surgery or watchful waiting (SWW)). Mixed-effects regression models evaluated trends of QOL and symptoms between the cohorts.
resultsAmong 104 enrolled patients, mean age was 60.5 ± 11.5 years, 57 (55%) were male, and 95 (91%) were Caucasian. After a mean duration of 3.4 months of NT, 76 (73%) patients underwent SWW, while 28 (27%) did not (NS). Cancer type (HPB vs GI, OR 7.0, CI 2.7-19.3, p < 0.001), comorbidities (OR 1.72, CI 1.0-2.99, p = 0.05), and severe complications during NT (OR 4.2, CI 1.2-15.3, p = 0.03) were associated with NS. There were no differences between longitudinal QOL scores or PROs among patients who underwent SWW versus NS except for the lack of appetite, which was associated with NS (OR 3.6, CI 1.0-12.2, p = 0.04).
conclusionsAmong patients undergoing NT for GI/HPB malignancies, type of cancer, comorbidities, and severe complications during NT were associated with failure to undergo surgery, whereas QOL and PROs were largely not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39661262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.