ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025
Exploring the Issues Facing the Australian Community Mental Health Workforce: A National Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Solutions for the Workforce Challenges Facing Community Mental Health Support Workers: A Qualitative Study.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Workforce Allocation in Urban Community Mental Health Services: GIS-Based Analytical Insights for Policy and Planning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Commonwealth Psychosocial Support Program, funded by the Australian Government, offers psychosocial support to individuals with severe mental illness. Currently, little research has addressed the challenges confronting its workforce. This study aimed to assess whether recruitment, retention, and staff skills pose significant issues for the Commonwealth Psychosocial Support Program and to identify contributing factors. This study used a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design. 159 mental health support staff across Australia participated in an online survey. From this sample, 16 participated in a semi-structured interview. Survey data was analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests, while qualitative data was examined through deductive content analysis. 84%, 77% and 56% of staff agreed that recruitment, retention and the skill of staff are significant issues affecting the delivery of the Commonwealth Psychosocial Support Program, respectively. While no significant differences were found in staff characteristics for recruitment and retention concerns, geographical location showed notable disparities in perceptions of staff skill (χ²(4, N = 153) = 11.318, p = 0.023). Specifically, a higher proportion of rural or remote (68%) and regional (63%) staff identified staff skill as an issue compared to metropolitan counterparts (39%). Key factors contributing to poor recruitment included short-term contracts (77%), while burnout (74%) and job insecurity (72%) were indicated for poor retention. Inadequate skill was attributed to infrequent professional development (53%), insufficient on-the-job training (53%), limited mentoring and supervision (50%), and unclear role expectations (50%). Addressing these multifaceted issues is imperative for enhancing the effectiveness of community-based mental health services and ensuring sustained support for individuals with severe mental illness across diverse geographical locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39661259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.