ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Development of a novel in vitro respiratory sensitization assay and its application in an integrated testing strategy (ITS).
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, evaluating respiratory sensitization is challenging with a lack of mechanistic understanding and appropriate testing methods. Given the similarities between skin and respiratory sensitization, using defined approach (DA) in OECD Test Guideline (TG) 497 will be helpful. However, adopting skin sensitization DA is not reliable in predicting respiratory sensitization and has not been validated. To address this limitation, we developed an in vitro respiratory sensitization assay (RS assay) to assess the inflammatory responses associated with respiratory sensitization. Additionally, we investigated the applicability of direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) for respiratory sensitization testing. Combined with in silico structure-activity relationship (SAR) predictions derived from the respiratory sensitization reactive domain, respiratory sensitization integrated testing strategy (ITS) was established. RS assay showed 80% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 90% accuracy. The respiratory sensitization ITS demonstrated more higher predictive capacity for respiratory sensitization than an individual test method, with 90% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 95% accuracy when using the 20 reference chemicals. When using respiratory sensitization ITS, hazard identification and sub-categorization of potency as strong, moderate/weak, and negative were possible. As a non-animal testing approach, the respiratory sensitization ITS represents a significant milestone for regulating respiratory sensitizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39661166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.